Notes From and About the King James Bible

Why This Blog?

Hello, this blog started with two goals in mind.  
(1) As a way to share my notes that I had on various topics, along with Scripture references written in the front and back of my Bible.  
(2) Explain the reasons for advocating the King James Bible in preference to ALL other modern English versions.

The way I study my Bible, might be different than someone else, but it is important nevertheless to study rather than simply read as if one was reading a novel.  Paul commended Timothy in II Timothy 2:15 "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth."  I generally like to read a chapter, and as I do I will attempt to boil it down to a handful of "bullet-points". So instead of starting at the beginning with Genesis and reading through to Revelation, I tend to pick sections such as creation, end times, history of the kings, the law, pauls letters, the prophets etc.  For example - Genesis thru Josuha or Judges thru Kings and Chronicles. Along the way, the entire Bible is not only read, but studied. These notes are mostly in here but some have been pulled out into their own post or page.

Many years ago I became aware of some of the newer Bible versions and while I realized they seemed to be worded or phrased in a more modern style, I never thought to look into it further.  I had always had a KJV and never had a reason to get another Bible.  It wasn't until many years after becoming aware of newer versions that I began to look into the matter.  The first thing that struck me was that specific verses were missing.  I wanted to know why.  You can read my notes on the KJV and why I am such an advocate for this and only this version, at least for English-speaking people here - "Why the King James Bible Stands Alone"

Comments on Baptists From their Enemies

If anyone has any familiarity with the booklet called "The Trail of Blood" (link ==> here), you may have noticed a quote on the first few pages, from a man known as Hosius Stanislaus.  This quote has caused some dispute, as its supposedly from a work titled "Apud Opera".  I will add, that while I am no historian or scholar, my impression of the Trail of Blood, is the author may be making some leaps to label so many groups as Baptist.  The Author, JM Carroll does however, on page 10 acknowledge "Let it not be thought that all these persecuted ones were always loyal in all respects to New Testament teachings."  That said, Carroll does provide numerous other quotes that echo my sentiments in general as well, that there have always been those that stood on the same doctrine of (1) Salvation by faith alone, without works and (2) Baptistm, while important, does not save.  They might not have always had buildings with signs out front, nor respected among the establishment, but they were there.  Some individuals may have been, at some points members of the Catholic church, but from the beginning there were those that would not adhere to those that would eventually become the Catholic church.  They refused to attend their councils and their demands to baptize their babies.  They preached the Gospel though pains of persecution and death.

On the subject of the works of Hosius Stanislaus, one work I did manage to find of his is titled "A Most Excelent Treatise of the begynnyng of herefyes ".  If anyone is familiar with the recent troubles at the Archive.org website, it might not surprise you when I say that website is having trouble still.  The work in question was originally written in Latin in 1565, but was translated into English (early modern/late middle) by another high-ranking Catholic cardinal named Richard Shacklock in about 1601.  A screenshot of the cover I provide below.  I can no longer locate this on Archive.org for some reason, but there is another copy (see link ==> here) which is actually more readable, but one needs to create a (free) account on archive.org to access the content. Another copy on the University of Oxford website is here (see link ==> here). In this book, the author makes numerous mentions of Anabaptists and connects them with the same doctrine dating all the way back to the time of Augustine (of Hippo), eg.  350AD.  Just one more tidbit to illustrate that Baptists are not "protestants", for they were around well before the "reformation".

 This is what the original copy of Richard Shacklock's translation looked like.  

Here is sample scan of just one of the pages I found interesting.  Out of the mouth of a high-ranking Catholic, they are connecting Baptists all the way back to the time of Augustine (of Hippo most likely, eg. 350 AD).  I've tried to highlight the portion of the text I'm referring to. The text says (in summary) that the doctrine of the Anabaptist reigned also in the time (tyme) of saint Augustine.

A Father's Admonition to His Son - King James VI & I to Prince Henry

 Recently I have re-discovered the fact that King James himself wrote many letters and these have been collected into various volumes.  I find it interesting to peek inside the thoughts of the man that God used to bring so many of the best scholars and linguists together for the translating of God's word into English.  

The title is a bit lengthy, and the writing is in the 1611 style English, but it is readable.

The workes of the most high and mightie prince, Iames, by the grace of God, king of Great Britaine, France and Ireland, defender of the faith
link here

The link above should take you to page 137, for a section titled 

HIS MAIESTIES IN
STRVCTIONS TO HIS
DEAREST SONNE, HENRY
The Prince.

Sound advice for any father to give his son, especially if this son is to be a ruler of men...a few examples

- Fear God
- Make ALL your laws spring from God's laws

What or who does God hate?

 If you ask most Christians this question, many if not most would say something to the effect "no, of course not". One euphemism commonly repeated is "love the sinner, hate the sin", but this isn't found in the Bible, but rather was said by Mahatma Gandhi, a Hindu, yet many Christians repeat this as if it were Scripture.

First, our authority on a topic needs to come from scripture, not what the preacher or some commentary says.
II Tim 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
II Peter 1:20
Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

Let's look at a few examples that seem to indicate that a blanket statement such as "God loves everybody", or "we're all God's children", just isn't supported in scripture.

Examples of God hating individuals

Lev 26:30
And I will destroy your high places, and cut down your images, and cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols, and my soul shall abhor you.

Gee whiz, that sounds mean...how come we never hear that preached in churches?

Deuteronomy 22:5
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

Psalms 5:5-6 
5:5 The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity. 
5:6 Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing: the LORD will abhor the bloody and deceitful man.

Psalms 6:8 
Depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity; for the LORD hath heard the voice of my weeping.

Matt 7:23
And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Psalms 10:3 
For the wicked boasteth of his heart's desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the LORD abhorreth.

The scriptures are telling us plainly that the Lord does not just hate sin, but the sinner also.

Hosea 9:15 God hated them....hmmm, not just sinful actions.  Some say this is just Hosea saying this, but where is God rebuking Hosea for saying this? Again, II Tim 3:16, he spoke under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost

Proverbs 1:24-30 doesn't sound like God is loving toward those who have rejected him, this also rebukes Calvinism because they did not choose to fear the Lord.
for example, in verse 26:
I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh;

Now when calamity comes upon them and they call upon the Lord, He will not answer them.  This is an example of a reprobate as mentioned in Romans 1

II Tim 3:1-8 speaks of those being reprobate concerning the faith and to turn away from them.

Acts 1:16-20 concerning Judas which the Holy Ghost spake by the mouth of David which references Psalms 69:28(let his habitation be desolate) and 109:7-16 (let his bisopprik take)

Psalms 69:28 says let them be blotted out of the book of the living, gee that's pretty harsh...

Psalms 109:7-16, Gee this passage sounds pretty harsh also toward individuals, not just the sin 

Acts 13:22 God says that David, son of Jesse was a man after his own heart

Psalms 139:21,22 David, under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost says that he hates those that hate the Lord.  In verses 23,24 he says "search me and see if there be any wicked way in me". 

Some might say this was just David speaking on his own accord, but where is the proof of this.  Is David ever rebuked by God for saying these things?

Common objections

Some will use the verses below to justify a blanket 

John 3:16 
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

note: For God so loved the world.  This is past tense.  

I Tim 2:4 
Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

II Peter 3:9 
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

Yes, God would rather everyone get saved. God showed his love toward the world by sending His Son in the flesh, that the world through him might be saved. Yet some would refernce this to invite homosexuals, pedophiles and other degenerates into church to have cookies and koolaid with the children.

Yet there are those that the Bible speaks of who hate the Lord and have rejected His offer of salvation one too many times. This is the meaning of a reprobate.

Romans 1:27
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

Those that hate the Lord

II Chronicles 19:2
And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the LORD.

Summary
Helping your unsaved,stubborn neighbor who has yet to believe and trust that they are bound for hell yet Jesus died for their sins is one thing.  Helping those that hate the Lord is another. Your neighbor might not yet understand the good news of the gospel, but they hopefully aren't actively involved in things that promote wickedness, blaspheme His Word, or persecute God's people. This world is full to the brim with degenerate people who despise the things of God and are hard at work trying to turn His truth into a lie.  

What Does The Bible Say Regarding The Law for Christians

Introduction
There is a common perception among Christians that the law of Moses and the Old Testament in general are only in the Bible for historical purposes, or something to that effect.  Many will reply with something along the lines of "we're under grace now, not the law".  The problem is they are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. On the other hand, there are those that say we still need to keep the law, feasts and festivals etc.  Let's look at what the Bible says regarding the law. 

What is meant by the "law"?
Generally, this will refer to the Ten Commandments, found in Exodus ch 20 as well as other laws and ordinances in the books of Exodus, Leviticus and Deuteronomy.  These laws prescribed the types of punishments for certain types of sin, ordinances for the priests, dealing with sacrifices and offerings, various ways to keep clean and many other things. Many of the things mentioned would seem harsh by todays standards.

Saved by Grace, through faith alone
There are so many places in the New Testament that salvation is of faith and faith alone. Paul spent a great deal of his epistles hammering this very subject.  Here are but a few examples:
Saved by grace through faith, not our works Ephesians 2:8,9
By His mercy Titus 3:5
Justified by faith without the law Romans 3:28
Grace or works? one or the other, it cant be part both Romans 11:6

All Scripture is still relevant
Profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction II Timothy 3:16
Not subject to your private interpretation II Peter 1:20
God promised to preserve His Word Psalms 12:6,7
Sodom and Ghomora still an example today Jude 1:7
Things that happened to their fathers are to be examples for us I Corinthians 10:11

Paul dealt with Judiazers
In the book of Galatians, Paul dealt with those that tried to bring believers back under jewish traditions with feasts, observing new moons etc.

What then serveth the law?
So if a Christian is to be justified by faith alone, yet ALL Scripture is still relevant for us, how  then should they view all the things mentioned in Exodus through Deuteronomy. As mentioned in the beginning, many will typically throw the baby out with the bathwater, casting aside punishments for adultery, theft or even murder.
Do whatever we want because we're not under the law? No! Romans 6:14,15
Paul accused of saying, do evil.  Romans 3:8,9
However, the law is still good, if used lawfully, according to the gospel I Timothy 1:8-11
Jesus referenced the law in Matthew 15:4 which is referring to Ex 20:12 and Ex 21:17

Summary
- One is saved by grace through faith, without the deeds of the law
- Christians are not under the law, but under grace
- Being under grace doesn't give us the right to do whatever we want
- The law is still good and we can look to it for examples of what is right and wrong for those things that still apply, eg.  murder etc.
- America for most of its early history used the Old Testament laws as a template for it's own laws. Some were taken straight out of Leviticus.

Baptism Is Important But It Doesn't Save

Does Baptism save?

The short answer is - NO, salvation is only by believing on the Lord Jesus Christ.

There is a false doctrine out there known as "baptismal regeneration". It teaches that without being baptized you are not going to heaven. Those that hold to this generally also believe that one can lose their salvation, which is also false.  The aspect of baptism being a necessary part of salvation is like many other false doctrines, which come about by taking verses out of context or using symbolism (and also often out of context) in place of clear scriptures. Also, the reverse can often be used to promote false doctrine - that of taking something literal when symbolism is being implied. Baptism is simply a picture of one's public acknowledgement of belief and trust in the gospel and pictures the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. See Romans 6:4 and Colossians 2:12 which is clearly symbolic, unless you try to imply that you literally need to be buried also, or circumcised? Baptism alone or in part does not save someone.

Salvation is by faith alone in Jesus Christ 

John 3:16-18
whosoever believeth, nothing else is mentioned in order to receive eternal life.
Acts 8:35-38 
Phillip responded to the eunuch when he asked what prevented him from getting baptized as that only IF he believed with all his heart.
Acts 16:29-33
Clear question as to what one MUST do to be saved. Answer is clear, just believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.
Romans 3:28
A man is justified by faith, not faith + baptism, nor baptism alone
Romans 4:5-8
To him that worketh not.  Faith alone for remission of sins past, present and future!

In fact, the whole of the Scriptures is that salvation comes simply by faith.  Some would say also that it was "different in the Old Testament...you had to keep the law and do sacrifices".  To that, we find the following:

Hebrews 10:1
The law was a shadow of things to come 
Hebrews 10:4
The blood of bulls and goats should not take away sins
Hebrews 9:22
without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins

So, if blood must be shed for the remission of sins and yet the blood of bulls and goats wouldn't do it, who or what's blood is required?
The answer is - the blood of Jesus! 1 John 1:7

So, let's look at some areas of Scripture where those advocating this false doctrine will have you turn to "prove" their point.

Scriptures used to advocate "Baptismal regeneration"

Mark 1:1-4
The remission of sins = forgiveness of sins. The way you get pardoned of sins = baptism? So, at first glance, this seems to contradict Acts 10:43 that says by believing we should get remission of sin. The Word of God has no contradictions. If you find something at first glance appears to be a contradiction, you either have a corrupted text (which is why I stick with the KJV) or you simply need to study.
So then just what IS John's baptism being mentioned here in Mark I? The key to this is found in the first part of Acts 19 where we find a passage that has Paul asking if they at Corinth had received the Holy ghost yet? They replied that they didn't even know there was a Holy ghost! Ephesians 1:13 makes it clear that one must believe and trust the gospel of Jesus Christ, it is then that you receive the Holy ghost. Then Paul asks them unto what they were baptized, and their reply was unto John's baptism. Paul then confirmed that John baptized with the baptism of repentance saying that they should believe on the one that should come after him. When they heard this, THEN they got baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. I find it remarkable that the label Baptist was first in the form of ana-baptist, which means "re-baptize and it was a derogatory term! Only later was the term "ana" dropped. Yet here Paul is telling people that unless they believe FIRST then get baptized, then baptism is of no use. This is why we need to do like those Bereans in Acts 17:11 and search the scriptures daily to see if these things be so!

I Peter 3:21
This seems to be the favorite of those advocating baptism being necessary to go to heaven. First, this chapter is being addressed to those that were already saved. Second, this individual verse makes it clear that baptism is a like figure, or symbol of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. In other words, it is figurative.

Acts 2:38
Again, this passage some use to claim that it is baptism that gives us the remission of sins.  It's worth noting that it is this same chapter some use to advocate what is known as "speaking in tongues" and typically point to this chapter (verse 4) but if you keep reading after verse 4, it's clear that this simply means other languages, not some gibberish that nobody can understand.  Ok, so what of baptism here?  Again, how does one receive remission of sins? It is only the blood of Jesus and believing on Him! So, verse 38 where it says "Repent, and be baptized", Peter is not saying anything different than Paul nor is Peter contradicting any other part of Scripture. We see the same sequence of events - believe THEN baptism. Also, like elsewhere, if we KEEP READING, this is made clear, as in just a few verses later, the Bible says in verse 41 "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized".  Jesus nails this in John 3:1-6 describing how someone becomes born again.

Mark 16:16
"He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned."
Another of the go-to verses for those advocating baptism being necessary to go to heaven. Where they fall into error is taking this verse literally. So then one must ask that if one believes but is not baptized what then? So, they don't go to hell because they believe, but don't go to heaven because they weren't baptized?  Sorry, there is no "purgatory" either.  Ok, so if you take this literally, then let's look at another passage about baptism in Colossians chapter 2

2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:  

2:12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

If you take verse 12 literally, then will you also take verse 11 literally?  Ouch!

Conclusion

There are lots of things the Bible talks about what we should do after believing, but there is one thing and only one thing that we must do to go heaven.  Anything we add to that one thing is the equivalent to saying that the gospel of Jesus Christ isn't enough. There is a reason John 3:16 is one of the most famous verses in the Bible.  It is so simple yet so powerful.  Simply believe and put ALL your trust in Jesus and what HE did in order to avoid hell and go to heaven instead.  

Common Contentions

Below are a few key subjects that can cause contentions/arguments over what the Bible teaches. Many Baptists today hold the following views:
- The rapture will occur BEFORE Daniel's 70th week begins
- The Jews are still God's chosen people
- Homosexuals can be saved
- We're not to judge anyone
- America is still a Christian nation, a shining city on a hill.  We just have a problem with democrats.

Below are a few areas of Scripture that address these subjects.  Also note that when addressing someone who is likely going to be older than you or is at very least saved and a brother/sister in Christ...reprove with scripture instead of rebuke. In other words, be respectful.
- Rebuke not an Elder, I Timothy 5:1
- Reprove with scripture, II Timothy 3:16

Don't judge
- Reprove not a scorner, Proverbs 9:8
- Judge righteous judgement, John 7:24
- Pull the beam out of thine own eye, Matthew 7:3,4
- Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, Matthew 7:6

Kings and kingdoms
- Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, Isaiah 10:1
- By me kings rule, Proverbs 8:15,16
- Jehu rebukes Jehoshaphat, II Chron 19:2
- Obey the laws of the land, Romans ch 13
- Judge not for man, but for the Lord, II Chronicles 19:6

Israel
- Genesis 12 vs II Chronicles 19:2, Galatians 3:16,28,29, Romans 9:6

Reprobates
- Worthy of death, Romans 1, same as Leviticus 20:13
- Don't negotiate with terrorists, I Kings 20
- No rest for the wise man that contends with a fool, Proverbs 29:9

Rapture BEFORE tribulation
- II Thessalonians ch 2 is clear the antichrist must be revealed first, and that doesn't happen until the middle of the 7 year period known as Daniel's 70th week.
- Jesus is speaking to Christians in Matthew 24